Electronic voting systems have changed the way conferences, training sessions and lectures work. Rather than the traditional delivery from a presenter to an audience that is (hopefully) awake and attentive, these scenarios are transformed into interactive experiences in which participants can log their opinions in real-time, through wireless keypads. Not only does this promote attentiveness, but it also makes information easier to digest, understand and retain.
There are times, however, when a more in-depth exploration of material is required and the participants’ opinions are crucial. While electronic voting systems may provide presenters with instant feedback, they are not able to get to the minutiae of the matter.
A Talking Point
There are times in a conference situation when the audience needs to be given its voice. Audience debate, discussion and questions can offer valuable insights into the material that they are being asked to take on board. Audience voting systems can tackle this problem, too.
IML’s keypads have built in handheld microphones, allowing participants to communicate directly with the presenter and the rest of the audience. The ability to express opinions makes a participant feel valued and engaging debate can also help others to soak up more information and fully engage with the material. If this sounds like a potential nightmare in which a presenter has to shout over various miked-up voices, think again. The handheld microphones operate on a first come, first served basis. Any delegate wishing to speak simply activates their microphone at the press of a button. The first microphone to register with the voting software is the only one that will be connected; all other microphones will be deactivated to prevent interruption.
Questions, Questions…
Using this system, presenters can facilitate Question and Answer sessions constructively and without the need for a ‘roving microphone.’ The result is that Q and A sessions can be speedy and focused. In addition, it gives the meeting facilitator greater control over the direction of the meeting.
Electronic voting systems can be more than just a poll; they can be engaging experiences in which participants can be heard.